At the bottom line, 2024 GAAP net income was $1.82B, down from $2.52B in 2023 (a -27.78% decline). The drop in GAAP net income masks a stronger cash‑generation pattern in operating activities: net cash provided by operating activities jumped +67.13% year‑over‑year to $3.61B in 2024, driven largely by working‑capital timing and the cash effects of regulated receipts. Those cash gains, however, were overwhelmed by capital spending of $4.77B, leaving FCF negative for the year and forcing continued reliance on financing to fund the company’s multi‑billion dollar infrastructure program.

Recalculating the balance-sheet leverage picture#

Con Edison’s balance sheet expanded alongside the rate base. At year‑end 2024 the company reported total assets of $70.56B, total debt of $27.82B, and net debt of $26.5B (after cash). Using those line items, debt/equity converts to roughly 1.27x (127%) and net debt/EBITDA (using 2024 EBITDA of $5.48B) is ~4.84x. Those calculations differ modestly from some published TTM metrics in the dataset (which show net debt/EBITDA ~4.38x and debt/equity ~114%), reflecting timing and differing EBITDA denominators. Given Con Edison’s capital program, the higher leverage per our balance‑sheet linkage is a relevant working metric for lenders and bond investors assessing covenant headroom and incremental funding cost.

Historical performance table (income statement highlights)#

Year	Revenue (USD)	Operating Income (USD)	Net Income (USD)	Net Margin
2024	15,260,000,000	2,730,000,000	1,820,000,000	11.93%
2023	14,650,000,000	2,310,000,000	2,520,000,000	17.20%
2022	15,660,000,000	2,620,000,000	1,660,000,000	10.60%
2021	13,670,000,000	2,800,000,000	1,350,000,000	9.84%

These figures confirm a steady revenue base with operating leverage present in 2024, while the net margin volatility underscores the impact of non‑operating items and one‑time influences on GAAP earnings.

Balance-sheet & cash-flow table (selected items)#

Year	Total Assets	Total Debt	Net Debt	CapEx	Net Cash from Ops	Free Cash Flow
2024	70,560,000,000	27,820,000,000	26,500,000,000	(4,770,000,000)	3,610,000,000	(1,160,000,000)
2023	66,330,000,000	25,010,000,000	23,820,000,000	(4,490,000,000)	2,160,000,000	(2,340,000,000)
2022	69,060,000,000	24,410,000,000	23,130,000,000	(4,170,000,000)	3,940,000,000	(233,000,000)

The table makes clear that Con Edison consistently invests a large share of cash flow into the business (capex / revenue ~31.3% in 2024), which increases rate base but keeps free cash flow negative while projects are completed and recovered through rates.

Earnings quality and the cash-flow disconnect#

The quality question is twofold: are reported earnings underpinned by recurring, ratable utility economics, and do those earnings convert into distributable cash? On the first point, the business is a regulated monopoly whose projects—once placed into service—earn an allowed return embedded in customer rates. That structural characteristic explains why management can convert capex into stable future cash flows and why reported operating income and margins improved in 2024. The company’s ability to secure rate adjustments and place projects in service is the primary driver of sustainable earnings.

On the second point, conversion into free cash is still a work in progress. The company reported operating cash flow of $3.61B in 2024 but after $4.77B of capital spending ended with free cash flow of -$1.16B. Annual dividends paid were roughly $1.10B in 2024, so cash available to fund capex, dividends and debt maturities has required access to financing. The practical implication is that, until a meaningful portion of the multi‑year capital program lives in rate base, the company will continue to rely on debt and periodic equity issuance to fund investment without materially altering the dividend.

Dividend mechanics and coverage#

Con Edison pays annual dividends of $3.38 per share, which at the current share price of $97.18 equals a yield of 3.48%. Using reported EPS of $5.50 (company quote) the dividend payout ratio is ~61.45%, while applying net income per share TTM of $5.37 gives ~62.96%. The dataset shows alternative payout figures (around 58.24%) that use different denominators; regardless, the company’s payout sits in a range typical for regulated utilities and is supported by predictable rate‑base cash flows in steady states. The critical caveat is that dividend coverage in cash terms is more constrained because free cash flow has been negative in recent years and capex remains elevated.

Capital allocation: debt, equity and the cost of funding#

Con Edison has funded its investment program through a mix of internally generated cash, debt and periodic equity offerings. The company executed equity transactions in 2024–2025 including forward sale arrangements and public offerings to support subsidiary capital needs. Those moves smooth cash requirements but produce share count dilution over time. Recalculating outstanding shares from the market capitalization (Market Cap $35.05B) and share price ($97.18) gives an implied ~360.7M shares outstanding. Using that share base, the reported free cash flow equates to roughly -$3.22 per share in 2024, a useful per‑share perspective when juxtaposed with the $3.38 annual dividend.

Leverage metrics matter here: our balance‑sheet calculation shows total debt to equity of ~1.27x and net debt/EBITDA about 4.84x (2024). Those leverage levels are higher than the lower‑end utility peer set and reflect both the capital intensity of Con Edison’s service territory and recent acquisitions and project funding choices. Higher leverage increases sensitivity to interest rates and raises the cost of incremental financing, which in turn influences how the company paces equity issuance versus debt maturity schedules.

Regulatory centrality: why New York rate cases are the swing factor#

Con Edison’s ability to translate capex into earnings depends on rate‑case outcomes and allowed returns set by the New York State Public Service Commission (NYSPSC). The company’s multi‑year capital program — including a clean‑energy buildout and transmission modernization — is banked on regulators approving timely cost recovery and designing mechanisms that permit the company to earn its authorized return. The dataset and recent filings indicate that management has sought material electric and gas delivery increases to be implemented in 2026, and those requests are being scrutinized amid affordability concerns in Albany. A favorable regulatory outcome de‑risks the earnings and cash conversion outlook; an adverse or materially scaled‑back outcome would compress prospective returns on deployed capital and extend the period of negative FCF.

Peers, valuation and forward multiples#

On a simple earnings multiple basis, Con Edison’s current market metrics are in line with regulated‑utility norms. Using the current price ($97.18) and reported EPS ($5.50) yields a P/E of ~17.67x, consistent with the dataset’s P/E figure. Using the company’s 2025 consensus EPS estimate (approx $5.62), the forward P/E implied by the present price is ~17.29x. Enterprise‑value multiples in the dataset (EV/EBITDA ~10.39x TTM) place Con Edison in the middle of the utility pack: not a deep discount, but modestly cheaper on some book‑value and EV metrics. The key valuation variable, however, is the expected pace of rate‑base growth and the allowed return on equity set by regulators — both of which materially move DCF valuations but only slowly affect simple multiples.

What this means for investors#

Con Edison’s story in 2025 is one of execution under regulatory watch. The company continues to convert projects into rate‑recoverable assets, producing operating income and a multiyear revenue stream. The positive elements include an earnings beat and reaffirmed guidance, improving operating margins, and a reliable dividend underpinned by regulated cash flows. The constraining elements are the negative free cash flow during the capex cycle, rising net debt (now $26.5B) and sensitivity to New York rate‑case decisions that will determine how quickly capex translates into distributable cash.

Investors should treat the dividend as durable but expect dividend growth pacing to be contingent on how quickly the company moves investments into a rate‑earning base and on whether management balances equity issuance with leverage targets. Credit and fixed‑income investors should focus on net debt/EBITDA and interest coverage trends, while equity holders with an income bias should be prepared for incremental dilution episodes tied to funding the capital program.

Forward-looking considerations and catalysts#

Near‑term catalysts that will materially affect the investment case include final NYSPSC rate‑case decisions affecting electric and gas delivery charges, the pace at which large transmission projects are placed into service, and the company’s future use of equity markets to fund incremental needs. On the positive side, if regulators largely affirm the company’s requested recovery mechanisms and allowed returns, the large capex program becomes a durable growth engine and should lift cash flows over the medium term. On the negative side, any material trimming of rate adjustments or allowed ROE would reduce return-on-capital and extend the period of negative free cash flows.

Other macro factors worth watching are interest-rate trajectories and inflation trends: higher rates increase discounting of regulated cash flows and raise financing costs, while sustained inflation can pressure operating costs—though utilities with clear cost‑recovery riders are better insulated.

Key takeaways#

Con Edison is executing on a capital‑heavy plan that is producing operating earnings but not yet consistent cash surplus after investments. The firm's regulated position in New York gives it a structural path from capex to rates to earnings, but that path requires cooperative regulatory outcomes and continued access to capital markets. Measures that matter most in the near term are free cash flow, net debt/EBITDA (we calculate ~4.84x for 2024), dividend coverage in cash terms, and the NYSPSC rulings on pending rate cases.

Conclusion#

Consolidated Edison’s May 2025 earnings beat and the ongoing conversion of grid investments into rate‑recoverable assets validate management’s operational playbook, but the company remains in a capital‑intensive phase where free cash flow is negative and balance‑sheet flexibility is being actively managed through debt and equity issuance. The investment story is therefore conditional: the regulated economics provide a predictable long‑term framework, but near‑term outcomes depend heavily on regulatory decisions and the company’s ability to convert investment into distributable cash without materially eroding financial flexibility. For market participants, the actionable lens is not a binary valuation call but a rolling assessment of regulatory progress, capex-to-rate base conversion and cash‑flow trajectory — the very levers that will determine how quickly Con Edison’s earnings quality translates into cash power.

Sources cited in‑text: Con Edison FY2024 financial statements (accepted 2025‑02‑20); Con Edison earnings releases and surprises (2025‑05‑01); Consolidated Edison (Wikipedia); Investing.com (Wikipedia). All numeric calculations in this note are derived from the company financials summarized above and the market data reported in the provided dataset.