FY2024 results and an attention‑grabbing valuation gap#
Palantir’s most immediate, newsworthy development is the juxtaposition between solid corporate results for the fiscal year and a market valuation that assumes near‑perfect execution. For FY2024 the company reported revenue of $2.87B and net income of $462.19MM, with free cash flow of $1.14B, according to the company’s FY2024 filings (Form 10‑K, filed Feb 18, 2025) (https://www.sec.gov/ix?doc=/Archives/edgar/data/0001308173/000130817325000009/pltr-20241231.htm). At the same time the market capitalization sits near $357B on the latest snapshot, a level that implies a price-to-sales multiple well into triple digits relative to FY2024 revenue. That gap — strong cash generation versus extreme multiples — is the central tension investors are wrestling with today.
The numbers themselves tell a story of transition. Palantir recorded gross profit of $2.30B (about 80.1% of revenue) and an operating income of $310.4MM (about 10.8% of revenue), with net income margin near 16.1% for FY2024. The company converted earnings into cash at a high rate: reported net cash provided by operating activities of $1.15B and free cash flow of $1.14B for the year, underlining that the business is cash‑generative at scale.
Yet market behavior in August 2025 — a pullback after a period of intense rerating in which Palantir became one of the poster children of the AI trade — highlights how quickly sentiment can amplify valuation questions. The Fujitsu distribution partnership announced Aug 19, 2025 is a tangible strategic step to internationalize the company’s Artificial Intelligence Platform (AIP), but the market continues to oscillate between enthusiastic re‑rating and profit‑taking narratives (Fujitsu press release)(https://global.fujitsu/en-global/newsroom/gl/2025/08/19-01).
Professional Market Analysis Platform
Unlock institutional-grade data with a free Monexa workspace. Upgrade whenever you need the full AI and DCF toolkit—your 7-day Pro trial starts after checkout.
Financial momentum: growth, margins and the quality of earnings#
Measured year‑over‑year, product momentum and profitability both improved materially in FY2024. Using Palantir’s reported consolidated figures, FY2024 revenue rose to $2.87B from $2.23B in FY2023, a calculated YoY increase of +28.70%. Net income improved from $209.82MM to $462.19MM, a YoY improvement of +120.35%. Those gains reflect both scale and an operating leverage inflection: operating income rose to $310.4MM in 2024 from $119.97MM in 2023, implying an operating income margin expansion to +10.81% from +5.39% a year earlier.
Profitability is not just on paper. Free cash flow for FY2024 was $1.14B, which equates to a free cash flow margin of +39.79% relative to FY2024 revenue. That conversion rate is unusually high for a growth software company and points to earnings quality driven by real cash generation rather than purely accounting gains. The reconciliation between net income (non‑cash items, stock‑based compensation) and operating cash flow bears watching, but the company’s FY2024 cash flow statement shows operating cash significantly higher than reported net income, indicating earnings are translating into cash at scale (SEC Form 10‑K)(https://www.sec.gov/ix?doc=/Archives/edgar/data/0001308173/000130817325000009/pltr-20241231.htm).
Despite the strong cash profile, some commonly reported multiples are extreme and sensitive to small changes in underlying assumptions. Using a market cap near $357.24B and FY2024 revenue of $2.87B, the market‑cap‑to‑revenue ratio calculates to approximately 124.55x. Independently computing a trailing price‑to‑earnings multiple using the latest price snapshot (price ≈ $157.08) and reported TTM net income per share (~$0.32) gives a P/E in the high hundreds (roughly 490.88x). Those calculated multiples differ from some data feeds' published ratios — an issue we return to below on reconciliation — but they illustrate why even modest execution variance could produce outsized price volatility for a stock priced on long‑range perfection.
Monexa for Analysts
Go deeper on PLTR
Open the PLTR command center with real-time data, filings, and AI analysis. Upgrade inside Monexa to trigger your 7-day Pro trial whenever you’re ready.
Two data tables: multi‑year income statement and balance sheet / cash flow summary#
| Year | Revenue (USD) | Gross Profit (USD) | Operating Income (USD) | Net Income (USD) | Gross Profit % | Net Income % |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 2,870,000,000 | 2,300,000,000 | 310,400,000 | 462,190,000 | 80.14% | 16.11% |
| 2023 | 2,230,000,000 | 1,790,000,000 | 119,970,000 | 209,820,000 | 80.27% | 9.41% |
| 2022 | 1,910,000,000 | 1,500,000,000 | -161,200,000 | -373,700,000 | 78.53% | -19.56% |
| 2021 | 1,540,000,000 | 1,200,000,000 | -411,050,000 | -520,380,000 | 77.92% | -33.79% |
| (Income statement figures are drawn from the company’s FY annual filings; percentages calculated from the reported line items) (https://www.sec.gov/ix?doc=/Archives/edgar/data/0001308173/000130817325000009/pltr-20241231.htm). |
| Year | Cash & Equivalents (USD) | Cash + Short‑Term Invest (USD) | Total Current Assets (USD) | Total Current Liabilities (USD) | Total Debt (USD) | Net Debt (USD, calc.) | Operating Cash Flow (USD) | Free Cash Flow (USD) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 2,100,000,000 | 5,230,000,000 | 5,930,000,000 | 996,020,000 | 239,220,000 | -1,860,000,000 | 1,150,000,000 | 1,140,000,000 |
| 2023 | 831,050,000 | 3,670,000,000 | 4,140,000,000 | 746,020,000 | 229,390,000 | -601,650,000 | 712,180,000 | 697,070,000 |
| 2022 | 2,600,000,000 | 2,630,000,000 | 3,040,000,000 | 587,940,000 | 249,400,000 | -2,350,000,000 | 223,740,000 | 183,710,000 |
| 2021 | 2,290,000,000 | 2,520,000,000 | 2,860,000,000 | 660,060,000 | 260,070,000 | -2,030,000,000 | 333,850,000 | 321,220,000 |
| (Balance sheet and cash flow figures are taken from annual reports; net debt is calculated here using cash and cash equivalents minus total debt as disclosed — consistent with the company’s reported net debt line) (https://www.sec.gov/ix?doc=/Archives/edgar/data/0001308173/000130817325000009/pltr-20241231.htm). |
Strategic momentum: AIP adoption, Fujitsu partnership and customer metrics#
Palantir’s strategic narrative in 2025 has centered on its Artificial Intelligence Platform (AIP) as an operational layer that stitches customer data ontologies to external models and governed workflows. The company and multiple industry writeups attribute substantial acceleration in U.S. commercial sales to demonstrations and pilots tied to AIP capabilities, with reported U.S. commercial growth rates that have been materially higher than overall corporate growth in recent quarters. Those adoption signals are qualitative and quantitative at once: higher customer counts, faster deal closures and anecdotally deeper product penetration within existing accounts.
A key, concrete strategic development is the Aug 19, 2025 collaboration extension with Fujitsu, aimed at broadening AIP availability in Japan and accelerating international go‑to‑market motion (Fujitsu press release)(https://global.fujitsu/en-global/newsroom/gl/2025/08/19-01). The partnership is salient because it addresses one of Palantir’s largest strategic constraints — international scale beyond the U.S. market — by leveraging a large local systems integrator and channel partner with installed enterprise relationships. That magnifies the TAM opportunity for AIP but also places execution pressure on Palantir to operationalize partner delivery, integrate local compliance practices, and translate pilots into multi‑year contracts.
Customer metrics embedded in recent company disclosures suggest adoption breadth is improving: a rising number of commercial customers and sequential growth in U.S. commercial revenue were highlighted in quarterly commentary in 2025. Those indicators are consistent with a broader structural shift from government‑dominated revenue toward a balanced commercial mix, which materially changes unit economics if enterprise implementations scale and maintain pricing discipline.
Valuation, market reaction and reconciliation of data feeds#
Investors watching Palantir must reconcile two simultaneous truths: a cash‑generative software company showing margin expansion, and a market that treats the company as if it will capture an outsized share of a multi‑trillion dollar AI market. Our calculation using the latest market snapshot (market cap $357.24B) divided by FY2024 revenue ($2.87B) produces a market‑cap‑to‑revenue ratio of ~124.55x. Independently calculated trailing P/E (price ≈ $157.08 / reported TTM net income per share ≈ $0.32) yields a P/E roughly 490.88x.
Those independently calculated multiples differ from some published feed values (for example, fundamentals in the dataset list a trailing price‑to‑sales figure of 103.92x and a trailing P/E nearer to 487x). The divergence can be traced to three common causes: timing of the market snapshot (price or shares outstanding), differing denominators (TTM revenue versus last fiscal year), and differing definitions of cash or investments used in net debt and current ratio calculations. For net debt specifically, Palantir’s published net debt figure of -1.86B aligns with subtracting cash and cash equivalents (not cash + short‑term investments) from total debt; using cash + short‑term investments produces a materially larger net‑cash figure. We prioritize raw, audited FY2024 line items for income and cash flow and use the most recent market snapshot for capitalization to produce transparent, reproducible ratios.
The market’s sensitivity to these ratios is not academic. August 2025’s pullback combined sentiment rotation, profit‑taking after rapid rerating, and headline‑driven insider selling narratives to produce price volatility. Commentary from outlets including Nasdaq, Seeking Alpha and others fed a feedback loop of skepticism about whether the company’s long‑term story was already priced. The core valuation question boils down to whether Palantir’s AIP will sustain high single‑digit to double‑digit organic growth for many years while also maintaining premium margins — a combination that must be proven repeatedly for the current valuation to stand (examples of market coverage: Nasdaq, Seeking Alpha)(https://www.nasdaq.com/articles/why-palantir-stock-sinking-today-2) (https://seekingalpha.com/article/4815948-palantir-the-ai-poster-child-appears-fairly-valued).
Competitive dynamics and sustainability of the moat#
Palantir’s competitive position has two axes: a product moat composed of a semantic Ontology, governance and workflow activation; and a sales/go‑to‑market moat formed by deep government and select commercial relationships. The Ontology approach — mapping disparate customer data into entities and relationships that produce context‑aware outputs — is a defensible technical advantage where switching costs can grow as customers operationalize workflows on the platform. Governance and human‑in‑the‑loop controls also address enterprise compliance and high‑stakes decisioning needs that commodity LLM offerings struggle to meet outright.
But the moat is not unassailable. Hyperscalers and cloud providers have the scale and distribution to embed AI capabilities into cloud stacks, and analytics specialists (including broadly adopted data platforms) are building their own operational layers. Pricing pressure is a credible threat: sustaining premium pricing requires consistent, demonstrable ROI for customers; if competitors deliver comparable outcomes at lower cost, margin erosion could follow. The risk is structural rather than temporary — commoditization of model access plus easier data connectivity could reduce the unique value of a separate orchestration layer unless Palantir continues to deepen domain‑specific integrations and expand the stickiness of Ontology assets.
Key risks, catalysts and the leading indicators to watch#
There are clear, measurable signals that will determine whether the market’s high expectations are justified. Leading indicators include the quarterly cadence of U.S. commercial revenue growth (especially whether the +90% reported in recent quarters sustains or normalizes), multi‑quarter enterprise conversion rates from pilot to multi‑year deployments, margin trajectories (particularly gross and operating margins), and renewal/expansion patterns in large accounts. Material non‑renewal or slower‑than‑expected conversion at a handful of large commercial customers could produce outsized percentage effects on growth given contract concentration dynamics.
Catalysts that could reduce valuation risk include consistent sequential reaccelerations in commercial revenue, visible international rollout results from partnerships such as Fujitsu (manifesting as contract announcements or revenue from the region), and continued high conversion rates from pilot to enterprise deployments. Conversely, sustained deceleration in growth rates, margin compression driven by competitive pricing, or deterioration in cash conversion metrics would be the clearest signals that the market should re‑price the company to a materially lower multiple.
What this means for investors and stakeholders#
For investors and other stakeholders the implications are straightforward: Palantir is no longer a speculative research‑stage firm — it is a cash‑generative software company with demonstrable enterprise adoption — and yet the stock price prices in a long runway of near‑flawless execution. The most actionable takeaway is not a recommendation but a framework for monitoring. Investors should focus on a small set of measurable indicators: sequential U.S. commercial revenue growth, pilot‑to‑enterprise conversion rates, renewal/expansion outcomes in large accounts, and the company’s ability to translate partner arrangements into non‑U.S. revenue growth. These metrics will clarify whether the company’s strategic narrative around AIP and the Ontology is creating sustainable enterprise economics or simply driving short‑term demand that is difficult to scale and monetize at premium rates.
When reconciling valuation feeds and published multiples, stakeholders should confirm the denominator and timing assumptions behind price‑to‑sales and P/E calculations. Differences often reflect whether an analyst uses TTM revenue, the last fiscal year, or a forward‑looking revenue estimate, and whether enterprise value calculations net short‑term investments or not. Transparent, consistent math reduces the noise in market narratives and emphasizes real operational progress.
Conclusion: a product‑led growth story tested by an extreme valuation#
Palantir’s FY2024 financials show a company that has moved into sustained profit and strong cash generation, with revenue +28.70% YoY and free cash flow margin near +39.79% for the year. Strategically, AIP and the Fujitsu partnership are credible steps to scale internationally and to translate product differentiation into broader TAM capture. Financially, however, the market continues to assign expectations that demand near‑perfect execution for years to come: our simple market capitalization / FY2024 revenue calculation yields roughly 124.55x — an elevated multiple that magnifies execution risk.
The investment story is therefore binary at scale: continuing strong execution (broad commercial adoption, consistent enterprise conversions, margin maintenance) will validate a premium multiple narrative; any persistent deceleration or margin erosion will force a closer look at more conventional technology multiples. For investors and corporate stakeholders, the objective metrics described above will be the most reliable guideposts for separating durable progress from headline‑driven momentum.
(Primary financial figures and line items are from Palantir’s FY2024 filings; strategic partnership commentary is from Fujitsu’s Aug 19, 2025 press release and contemporaneous market reporting)(https://www.sec.gov/ix?doc=/Archives/edgar/data/0001308173/000130817325000009/pltr-20241231.htm) (https://global.fujitsu/en-global/newsroom/gl/2025/08/19-01) (Nasdaq coverage)(https://www.nasdaq.com/articles/why-palantir-stock-sinking-today-2).