Free cash flow fell to $2.33B in FY2024 from $4.61B in FY2023, a decline of -49.46%, mirroring operating cash flow which decreased -40.38% to $4.19B [FY2024 cash flow statement] Vertex AI research: Phillips 66 WRB acquisition - redirect 1.

On the balance sheet Phillips 66 ended FY2024 with total assets of $72.58B, total stockholders’ equity of $27.41B, total debt of $20.06B, and net debt of $18.32B (after cash of $1.74B) [FY2024 balance sheet] Vertex AI research: Phillips 66 WRB acquisition - redirect 1.

Using Phillips 66’s FY2024 EBITDA of $5.99B, our independent calculation of net-debt-to-EBITDA is ~3.06x (net debt $18.32B / EBITDA $5.99B). That is a material leverage increase versus earlier years and explains why credit and liquidity metrics warrant attention even though absolute debt levels remain manageable for a large integrated downstream company. Note that various reported TTM metrics in third-party feeds differ modestly (for example, some sources record net-debt-to-EBITDA at 3.25x TTM), which reflects differing trailing-period definitions and quarterly smoothing; our figure is a direct FY2024 calculation from the company’s published year-end numbers [FY2024 balance sheet and income statement] Vertex AI research: Phillips 66 WRB acquisition - redirect 1.

Tables: multi-year income and balance-sheet snapshot#

Income statement (FY)	2022	2023	2024	YoY change (2023→2024)
Revenue	$170.12B	$147.26B	$143.12B	-2.81%
Gross profit	$12.77B	$11.29B	$4.86B	-56.94%
Operating income	$10.07B	$8.27B	$2.32B	-71.95%
Net income	$11.02B	$7.00B	$2.12B	-69.71%
EBITDA	$16.91B	$12.37B	$5.99B	-51.53%

(Figures per Phillips 66 FY2022–FY2024 statements) Vertex AI research: Phillips 66 WRB acquisition - redirect 1.

Balance sheet & cash-flow (FY)	2022	2023	2024	Notes
Cash & equivalents	$6.13B	$3.32B	$1.74B	Cash fell -47.59% YoY
Total assets	$76.44B	$75.50B	$72.58B	Slight asset reduction
Total debt	$17.19B	$19.36B	$20.06B	Gradual rise in gross debt
Net debt	$11.06B	$16.04B	$18.32B	Net debt up +14.21% YoY (2023→2024)
Free cash flow	$8.62B	$4.61B	$2.33B	FCF down -49.46% YoY
Dividends paid	$1.79B	$1.88B	$1.88B	Dividend cash stable
Share repurchases	$1.51B	$4.01B	$3.45B	Continued substantial buybacks

(Data from company cash-flow and balance-sheet statements) Vertex AI research: Phillips 66 WRB acquisition - redirect 1.

Capital allocation: buybacks, dividends and the WRB acquisition#

Capital allocation is the clearest management action visible in FY2024. Phillips 66 continued to prioritize shareholder returns: $1.88B of dividends and $3.45B of repurchases during the year. Those outlays consumed a large share of free cash flow and required using available cash and incremental leverage in a year when operating cash flow was down sharply [FY2024 cash-flow statement] Vertex AI research: Phillips 66 WRB acquisition - redirect 1.

In parallel, Phillips 66 went forward with strategic consolidation of certain refining assets. The company completed the acquisition of the remaining WRB stake (announced previously) for roughly $1.4B and characterized the deal as creating operational and commercial synergies of roughly $50M per year through better integration of the Wood River and Borger refineries into the broader network Vertex AI research: Phillips 66 WRB acquisition - redirect 11.

A straightforward arithmetic view of that acquisition—$50M of expected annual synergies against a cash price of $1.4B—gives a simple pre-tax cash-on-cash return of roughly 3.57% per year, implying a long payback horizon if the only benefit were the quantified synergies. The strategic rationale goes beyond that one line item: full integration can improve crude-slate flexibility, logistics, and marketing economics, but investors should recognize the math: the acquisition is not a near-term cash-return lever; it is a strategic consolidation whose return depends on longer-term margin normalization and execution.

Earnings quality and cash coverage of the payout#

Two widely watched measures—dividend coverage and buyback funding—expose the tension. On a per-share basis Phillips 66’s trailing dividend of $4.70 implies a dividend yield of 3.58% against the current share price $131.42. However, the dividend divided by trailing EPS (dividend/EPS) is greater than 100%—our calculation using reported TTM EPS of $4.22 yields a payout ratio of ~111.37% (4.7 / 4.22). That signals that, by pure accounting EPS, dividends exceed earnings and the difference has been funded by free cash flow, asset sales, and balance-sheet management rather than sustainable earnings growth alone [key metrics TTM] Vertex AI research: Phillips 66 WRB acquisition - redirect 1.

Viewed from cash-flow, however, dividends consumed ~89.1% of FY2024 net income (dividends paid $1.88B / net income $2.11B), while share repurchases were more funded by cash and incremental debt. That difference between EPS-based payout metrics and cash-flow coverage is important: dividends may look overstretched on an EPS basis but are still materially supported by cash that remains available—until commodity margins remain depressed or free cash flow fails to recover. Over time, persistent high payouts when earnings are down force either lower buybacks, balance-sheet adjustments, or dividend cuts if operating cash flow does not normalize.

Forward signals, analyst estimates and data inconsistencies#

Analyst estimates included in the company’s information set show recovery in projected EPS over the medium term: consensus models in the dataset imply EPS of $5.13 for 2025 and a steeper recovery to $10.56 in 2026 and $11.66 in 2027 (averages of analyst estimates in the dataset). Those estimates imply a normalization of refining margins and improved downstream performance. Investors should treat near-term analyst numbers with caution because they are sensitive to commodity cycles and refining crack spreads.

The dataset also contains a clear outlier: an estimated revenue figure for 2029 of $489.23B—well above the company’s historical peak and inconsistent with other year-by-year forward revenue entries. That number appears anomalous relative to 2025–2028 estimates clustered near $120B–$130B and should be treated as a probable data error. Where forward projections diverge materially, prioritize nearer-term analyst consensus and the company’s own guidance and reconcile outliers before using them in valuation or scenario analysis [company estimates, dataset].

Strategic context and competitive position#

Phillips 66 remains an integrated downstream operator with refining, midstream, and marketing assets. Management’s strategic moves—consolidating ownership in WRB, pursuing low-capital high-return projects, and continuing to optimize feedstock and logistics—are consistent with a playbook to improve throughput, crude-slate flexibility, and marketing integration. The company reported that the WRB consolidation adds roughly 250,000 barrels per day of refining capacity to bring total capacity close to 2.5 million bpd, a point management has emphasized in framing longer-term margin and scale benefits Vertex AI research: Phillips 66 WRB acquisition - redirect 11.

Those strategic levers are real but they are not immediate cures for a cyclical decline in margins. Execution will matter: the degree to which WRB integration, low-capex projects, and procurement optimization can offset a weaker macro refining environment will dictate whether the company can restore the higher EBITDA levels seen in 2022–2023.

What this means for investors#

First, Phillips 66’s FY2024 results underline the cyclical risk inherent in integrated downstream operations: top-line stability hides large swings in gross profit and EBITDA when commodity spreads move. The company’s earnings are sensitive to refining crack spreads and product demand patterns; FY2024 is a reminder that even large, integrated operators can see rapid margin compression.

Second, capital-allocation choices matter. Management’s continued preference for returning cash via buybacks and dividends has supported shareholder returns, but in a year of falling free cash flow the same policy raised net debt and reduced cash buffers. Investors should watch two metrics closely: operating cash flow recovery (and the path of free cash flow) and net-debt-to-EBITDA. Our FY2024 calculation of ~3.06x net-debt-to-EBITDA is materially higher than prior-year levels and signals less slack on the balance sheet for opportunistic investments.

Third, strategic M&A (WRB consolidation) is understandable in light of integration economics, but the pure synergy math is modest relative to the purchase price. The acquisition’s value depends heavily on sustained margin improvement and operational execution; it is not a near-term cash bonanza.

Finally, dividend metrics are nuanced: on an EPS basis the payout ratio exceeds 100% (dividend/EPS ~111.37%), but cash-flow coverage is stronger (dividends were ~89.1% of net income in cash terms). That means the dividend is currently funded, but it is vulnerable if operating cash flow does not recover.

Key takeaways#

• FY2024 net income fell to $2.12B (-69.71% YoY), while revenue declined -2.81%; margins were the primary casualty. [Phillips 66 FY2024 results] Vertex AI research: Phillips 66 WRB acquisition - redirect 1.

• Free cash flow compressed to $2.33B (-49.46% YoY); dividends of $1.88B and buybacks of $3.45B in FY2024 increased leverage and reduced cash balances. [FY2024 cash-flow statement] Vertex AI research: Phillips 66 WRB acquisition - redirect 1.

• Net debt rose to $18.32B and our FY2024 net-debt-to-EBITDA calculation is ~3.06x, up from prior-year levels—an important liquidity and covenant signal to monitor. [FY2024 balance sheet and income statement] Vertex AI research: Phillips 66 WRB acquisition - redirect 1.

• The WRB stake consolidation and related integration actions are strategically consistent but the explicitly quantified synergies ($50M annual) are small relative to the acquisition price ($1.4B), implying a long simple-payback if no further margin improvement materializes. [WRB acquisition details] Vertex AI research: Phillips 66 WRB acquisition - redirect 11.

Near-term watchlist (data-driven)#

Investors and analysts should track three measurable items over the next several quarters: the trajectory of refining crack spreads and downstream margins (the primary driver of EBITDA), quarterly operating cash flow and free cash flow relative to dividends and buybacks, and changes in net debt and liquidity metrics. Additionally, reconcile analyst consensus projections for EPS recovery with company commentary—treat outlier revenue projections (e.g., FY2029 in the dataset) as probable data errors until corroborated by multiple sources.

(Article conclusions grounded in Phillips 66 FY2022–FY2024 financial statements and company disclosures) Vertex AI research: Phillips 66 WRB acquisition - redirect 1.