Record Backlog and Cash Flow Take Center Stage#
General Dynamics ([GD]) closed FY2024 with a record consolidated backlog of roughly $103.7 billion, led by a Marine Systems backlog near $53 billion, and that shift in contract mix is already visible in the company’s cash flow and margin profile. The company reported FY2024 revenue of $47.72 billion and net income of $3.78 billion, delivering a revenue increase of +12.88% YoY and net income growth of +14.20% YoY compared with FY2023, underscoring both top-line expansion and operating leverage going into 2025 Barchart — Q2 earnings recap, Investing.com — Q2 backlog report. These figures reflect the conversion of large, multi-year Navy awards into booked revenue and near-term cash generation.
Professional Market Analysis Platform
Make informed decisions with institutional-grade data. Track what Congress, whales, and top investors are buying.
The most immediate and material development for GD’s financial story is the recent tranche of submarine-related awards and modifications. Notable items include a $1.85 billion long-lead materials contract modification for Virginia-class production and a $12.42 billion Virginia-class contract modification with program value that can escalate to $17.15 billion, both routed through Electric Boat — changes that helped lift backlog and give multiple years of revenue visibility to Marine Systems Naval Today — $1.85B contract, BreakingDefense — up to $17.1B modification. Those awards are not one-off orderbook items; they reshape the revenue cadence and working-capital profile for the business that is now the company’s growth engine.
Financials: Quality of Earnings and Cash Conversion#
Examining the FY2024 income statement and cash flow, the headline metrics tell a cohesive story: operating leverage from higher volume in shipbuilding, robust cash flow conversion and disciplined capital returns. GD reported operating income of $4.80 billion and EBITDA of $5.82 billion, producing an operating margin of ~10.06% and a net margin of ~7.92% (calculated as net income/revenue). These margin levels are consistent with the company’s multi-year profile where capital-intensive, fixed-price shipbuilding contracts produce stable margins once production lines reach scale Company FY2024 financials, as reported in public filings and analyst recaps.
More company-news-GD Posts
General Dynamics (GD): Backlog Strength Masks Near-Term Margin Pressure
GD sits on a **$103.7B** backlog (Marine Systems ~**$53B**) that secures multi-year revenue even as Marine Systems margins compress during a production ramp.
General Dynamics (GD): Record $103.7B Shipbuilding Backlog vs. Cash-Flow Strain
General Dynamics posts a record **$103.7B shipbuilding backlog** while FY2024 revenue rose to **$47.72B**; free cash flow fell to **$3.20B**, raising execution and margin focus.
General Dynamics Corporation Q2 2025 Update: Record Backlog and Robust Financials Signal Strength in Defense Sector
General Dynamics posts a record $103.7B backlog with 14% growth driven by naval contracts; Q2 2025 financials show solid revenue gains and strategic positioning.
Free cash flow for FY2024 was $3.20 billion, and importantly, GD converted approximately 84.6% of net income into free cash flow (FCF = $3.20B / Net Income $3.78B), a strong indicator of earnings quality and working-capital discipline in a business where progress payments and staged receipts can otherwise distort cash patterns. Operating cash flow came in at $4.11 billion, meaning GD sustained positive operating liquidity even while investing in yards and paying dividends and buybacks FY2024 cash flow data.
On leverage, GD’s net debt at year-end 2024 was roughly $8.98 billion (total debt $10.68B minus cash and equivalents $1.70B). Using FY2024 EBITDA of $5.82 billion, that implies a net debt-to-EBITDA of approximately 1.54x when calculated from the year-end figures (8.98 / 5.82). That level is consistent with investment-grade balance-sheet behavior and provides flexibility for continued yard investment, dividend payments, and moderate buybacks while preserving capacity for strategic spend FY2024 balance sheet.
Taken together, the margin profile, high FCF conversion and modest net leverage form the foundation for GD’s capital allocation choices in 2025: prioritize Marine Systems capacity while maintaining shareholder distributions and selective buybacks.
Recalculating the Key Metrics (FY2021–FY2024): Trends and Inflections#
To ground the narrative in numbers, I recalculated a set of primary metrics from the FY2021–FY2024 financials reported by the company. These figures demonstrate the earnings trajectory and capital structure shifts that matter for valuation and operational planning.
| Income statement (USD) | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue | 38,470,000,000 | 39,410,000,000 | 42,270,000,000 | 47,720,000,000 |
| Gross profit | 6,410,000,000 | 6,620,000,000 | 6,670,000,000 | 7,360,000,000 |
| Operating income | 4,160,000,000 | 4,210,000,000 | 4,250,000,000 | 4,800,000,000 |
| Net income | 3,260,000,000 | 3,390,000,000 | 3,310,000,000 | 3,780,000,000 |
| EBITDA | 5,190,000,000 | 5,310,000,000 | 5,250,000,000 | 5,820,000,000 |
(Values drawn from FY filings summarized in public coverage) Company filings summarized by StockAnalysis and Barchart, Barchart — Q2 recap.
Growth dynamics are simple to observe: revenue accelerated materially in 2024 (+12.88% YoY) driven principally by Marine Systems, while margins ticked modestly higher as volumes absorbed fixed costs. EBITDA rose +10.86% YoY between 2023 and 2024 (5.25B to 5.82B). That margin and scale improvement is the mechanical effect of winning and executing larger shipbuilding awards.
| Balance sheet & cash (USD) | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cash & equivalents | 1,600,000,000 | 1,240,000,000 | 1,910,000,000 | 1,700,000,000 |
| Total assets | 50,070,000,000 | 51,590,000,000 | 54,810,000,000 | 55,880,000,000 |
| Total liabilities | 32,430,000,000 | 33,020,000,000 | 33,510,000,000 | 33,820,000,000 |
| Total equity | 17,640,000,000 | 18,570,000,000 | 21,300,000,000 | 22,060,000,000 |
| Long-term debt | 11,830,000,000 | 10,570,000,000 | 10,250,000,000 | 8,860,000,000 |
| Net debt (calculated) | 11,570,000,000 | 10,870,000,000 | 9,170,000,000 | 8,980,000,000 |
Balance-sheet movement shows a deliberate reduction in gross debt and net leverage over the period, even as equity rose with retained earnings, supporting stable return on equity outcomes while preserving financial flexibility Balance sheet data and retained earnings figures.
Where the Revenue and Margin Gains Are Coming From: Marine Systems Focus#
The structural change underpinning GD’s FY2024 results and the 2025 narrative is a heavier revenue mix toward Marine Systems—Electric Boat in particular—where large, long-cycle submarine awards dominate. Marine Systems reported quarterly revenue uplifts in 2025 that reflect multi-year contract execution and long-lead material purchases now being recognized as backlog and staged revenue. That business benefits from scale economics that lift operating leverage once the supply chain and labor plans are synchronized to multi-year programs GovConWire — submarine industrial base coverage, Naval Technology — Q2 FY25 update.
Shipbuilding’s financial characteristics—high up-front capital intensity, long lead items, and progress-billings—lengthen revenue recognition horizons but also translate backlog into multi-year cash visibility. That’s visible in FY2024’s strong FCF and operating cash flow despite large yard investments and continued dividend payouts.
Competitive Dynamics: Why Submarine Work Creates a Structural Advantage#
General Dynamics’ specialization in submarine design and construction creates meaningful entry barriers. The combination of Electric Boat’s intellectual property, specialized yards, and supplier relationships makes the submarine industrial base an oligopolistic landscape where GD and Huntington Ingalls Industries (HII) play complementary but distinct roles. HII dominates certain surface-build segments such as aircraft carriers, while GD holds the primary role on Columbia-class and a major role on Virginia-class construction. That concentration of expertise reduces the pool of credible competitors for large undersea contracts and raises switching costs for the Navy—advantages that flow into backlog and margin durability for GD BreakingDefense — detailed contract context.
However, shipbuilding remains susceptible to cost inflation and schedule risk. Historical GAO reports highlight recurring overruns and delays across the U.S. naval shipbuilding base; that risk set remains relevant for GD, particularly as program complexity and labor-cost inflation persist U.S. GAO — shipbuilding overruns and delays. Thus, high backlog and favorable budget drivers are necessary but not sufficient conditions for shareholder value creation—execution is the critical margin of victory.
Capital Allocation: Dividends, Buybacks and Balance-Sheet Discipline#
GD’s FY2024 capital allocation continued to emphasize steady dividends and measured buybacks. Dividends paid totaled about $1.53 billion in 2024, while share repurchases ran near $1.5 billion for the year, reflecting a balanced return-of-capital approach that preserves investment capacity for yards and suppliers FY2024 cash flow. Dividend per share of $5.84 yields roughly 1.82% at the current price level noted in market quotes, and the payout ratio recalculated from FY2024 net income and dividend per share sits near 38.3% (Dividend Per Share $5.84 / Net Income Per Share 15.24), leaving meaningful headroom for continued distributions alongside reinvestment.
Net debt reduction and a net-debt-to-EBITDA ratio around 1.5x give management optionality: fund industrial-capacity expansion in Marine Systems, sustain shareholder returns, and selectively pursue M&A or large strategic investments should opportunities arise. The financial posture is consistent with an industrial prime that must balance long-term program commitments against cyclical defense-budget cadence.
Risks That Could Undermine the Narrative#
There are three execution risks that could alter the trajectory implied by backlog and recent awards. First, shipbuilding historically carries schedule and cost risk; overruns would compress margins and delay cash generation, reducing the near-term payoff from backlog growth GAO shipbuilding risks. Second, non-naval segments (Combat Systems and other units) have shown pockets of weakness; if those underperform materially, consolidated margins could lag despite Marine Systems strength. Third, supply-chain or labor disruption at yard suppliers—especially for long-lead materials—could slow throughput and increase costs, partially offsetting the benefits of large awards GovConWire — industrial base coverage.
What This Means For Investors#
GD’s recent results and contract awards create a clear investment narrative: backlog-led revenue visibility has translated into strong free cash flow and modest net leverage, enabling disciplined capital returns while funding yard investments. The fundamental proof points are the +12.88% revenue growth in FY2024, operating margin just over 10%, FCF of $3.2 billion, and net debt-to-EBITDA near 1.5x—all calculated from FY2024 reported figures and public summaries FY2024 financials, Barchart Q2 recap.
For investors tracking risk-adjusted exposure to defense spending, GD’s strengths are tangible: long-duration, funded contracts; an industrial moat in submarine construction; and high cash conversion that supports shareholder distributions. The counterbalance is execution risk in shipbuilding and pockets of underperformance elsewhere in the portfolio—factors that keep market multiples in check relative to some peers despite the record backlog [BreakingDefense; GovConWire].
Key Takeaways#
General Dynamics’ FY2024 results and 2025 contract flow create a coherent financial strategy: prioritize Marine Systems to realize scale and margin gains, sustain shareholder returns via dividends and buybacks, and maintain a conservative leverage posture to fund industrial investment. The key empirical points are: record backlog ($103.7B), Marine Systems backlog ($53B), FY2024 revenue $47.72B (+12.88% YoY), net income $3.78B (+14.20% YoY), FCF $3.20B (FCF conversion ~84.6%), and net debt ~$8.98B (net debt/EBITDA ~1.54x) [Investing.com; Naval Today; BreakingDefense; StockAnalysis; Barchart]. Investors should watch execution on Virginia- and Columbia-class schedules, margin trends in Combat Systems, and FY2026 Navy appropriations for confirmation of the durability embedded in the backlog [GovConWire; GAO].
Closing Synthesis and Forward Considerations#
General Dynamics is currently executing a clear strategy that aligns its capital allocation with the largest and most durable pockets of demand—U.S. Navy submarine construction—while preserving balance-sheet flexibility and shareholder returns. The financial evidence from FY2024 supports that strategy: expanding revenue, steady margins, strong cash conversion and manageable leverage. The near-term question for stakeholders is execution: can GD convert a historically risk-prone shipbuilding program into predictable, margin-accretive deliveries across the now-enlarged backlog? The answer will determine whether the backlog premium embedded in GD’s multiple is realized as sustained earnings growth or partially offset by program-level cost adjustments.
All specific financial figures cited in this analysis are drawn from GD’s FY2024 reported statements and quarter recaps aggregated by market coverage and filings; contract and backlog details are taken from contemporaneous reporting on recent Navy awards Barchart — Q2 recap, Investing.com backlog report, Naval Today, BreakingDefense, and public financial summaries StockAnalysis — GD statistics. The interplay of backlog quality, execution discipline and cash flow will be the dominant drivers of GD’s financial trajectory in the next several years.