A concentrated read of the FY figures: FY2024 revenue: $30.73B; gross profit: $4.10B (13.35% gross margin); operating income: $2.98B (9.69% operating margin); net income: $2.03B (6.61% net margin). These are the line-items reported in the FY2024 income statement FY2024 Income Statement.

Two additional dynamics deserve immediate attention. First, free cash flow swung from $4.90B in FY2023 to just $0.81B in FY2024 (a -83.57% change), reflecting both weaker operating cash and a meaningful step-up in capital spending and acquisitions. Second, capital deployment included $2.22B of share repurchases and $0.52B of dividends paid in FY2024, showing that management continued returning capital even as cash generation weakened FY2024 Cash Flow Statement.

While headline TTM metrics in the vendor data show different snapshots (for example, some TTM ratios reported elsewhere in the dataset), our calculations use the FY2024 reported line-items for consistency across the annual time series and to avoid mixing period conventions. Where TTM and FY numbers diverge we call it out explicitly.

Historical performance table: revenue and margins (FY2021–FY2024)#

Year	Revenue ($B)	Net Income ($B)	Net Margin (%)
2021	36.48	6.83	18.71%
2022	41.51	7.61	18.33%
2023	34.71	4.52	13.02%
2024	30.73	2.03	6.61%

These numbers are calculated from the company’s four full fiscal-year income statements and show a clear inflection: a peak in margins in 2021–2022 followed by a marked reversion in 2023–2024. The year‑over‑year net income decline from 2023 to 2024 is -55.20%, underscoring how quickly commodity spread dynamics and one-time costs can reshape profitability FY Income Statements.

Balance-sheet and cash-flow health: capacity to execute while returning capital#

Nucor entered its 2025 capex year with a sizable liquidity cushion but materially lower free cash flow generation. As of FY2024 year‑end the company reported cash & cash equivalents of $3.56B, total debt of $6.95B, and net debt of $3.39B, with total stockholders’ equity of $20.29B and total assets of $33.94B. Using those year‑end figures yields a current ratio of 2.50x (calculated as total current assets $12.47B divided by total current liabilities $4.98B) and a debt-to-equity ratio of 34.26% (total debt $6.95B / equity $20.29B) FY2024 Balance Sheet.

Net-debt to EBITDA is a commonly watched leverage gauge. Using FY2024 net debt ($3.39B) and FY2024 EBITDA ($4.49B) gives a ratio of 0.75x, materially below levels that would constrain capital allocation in normal cycles. Some vendor TTM metrics in the dataset show a higher net-debt-to-EBITDA figure (~1.37x); that stems from period-mix differences (TTM vs FY-end snapshots) and slightly different EBITDA definitions; the lower FY-end calculation suggests Nucor retained meaningful financial flexibility despite the earnings decline.

Balance-sheet & cash-flow table (FY2021–FY2024)#

Year	Cash & Equiv ($B)	Total Debt ($B)	Net Debt ($B)	Free Cash Flow ($B)	CapEx ($B)	Share Repurchases ($B)	Dividends ($B)
2021	2.36	5.68	3.32	4.61	1.62	3.28	0.48
2022	4.28	6.69	2.41	8.12	1.95	2.76	0.53
2023	6.39	6.84	0.46	4.90	2.21	1.55	0.52
2024	3.56	6.95	3.39	0.81	3.17	2.22	0.52

These cash-flow flows show that management continued to return capital while increasing capex and completing acquisitions (acquisitions net were -$0.76B in FY2024), producing a large swing in net cash at period end and an 83.57% drop in free cash flow year over year FY Cash Flow Statements.

Strategic investments and capital allocation: scale versus timing#

Nucor’s strategic posture is twofold: expand capacity and higher‑value mix via large, multi-year projects while preserving an investor-friendly payout posture through dividends and buybacks. Management signaled roughly $3.0B of capital spending in 2025, concentrated on projects expected to broaden product mix and increase tonnage of higher-margin products. Those initiatives include expansions and modernization that come with pre-operating charges; management disclosed pre-op charges in earlier quarters of 2025 that trimmed EPS by measurable amounts — a tradeoff the company is willing to make to lift future throughput and margin.

This plan is capital-intensive and depends critically on both execution discipline and a steady end-market. The math of the program is straightforward: to justify continued buybacks and dividends while spending at scale, projects must return incremental margins and throughput sufficient to generate attractive incremental free cash flow once commissioning completes. With FY2024 free cash flow at $0.81B, the pace of capex and the timing of project ramp matter. Management’s willingness to repurchase shares (-$2.22B in FY2024) alongside significant capex suggests a high conviction that projects will deliver multi-year returns — but it also raises execution risk if market spreads remain compressed longer than planned Vertex AI Research - QUERY 5 (Dividend Sustainability & Capital Allocation).

Margin compression: decomposition and causes#

The margin story is the most immediate operational risk. Between FY2022 and FY2024, gross margin fell from ~30% to 13.35%, and operating margin contracted from ~25% to 9.69%. That contraction is driven by three measurable channels.

First, price spread compression: steel is a commodity whose mill margins are the residual between finished-product prices and raw-material (primarily scrap) plus operating costs. When finished prices fall faster than scrap or energy costs, margins compress quickly. Second, mix and shipment timing: an outsized share of lower-margin products or shipment timing that forces realization at weaker spot prices can depress per-ton profitability for a quarter. Third, project-related start-up costs and acquisitions add near-term SG&A and pre-operating costs that depress operating income until plants reach steady-state throughput.

Management’s Q3 guidance — explicitly calling out Steel Mills margin compression — confirms that the driver is not weak demand per se but spread and mix dynamics and the cadence of project costs. That matters because a demand-led collapse would be harder to reverse; a spread/mix issue can recover if pricing stabilizes, scrap moderates, or product mix shifts back toward higher-margin lines Vertex AI Research - QUERY 2 (Margin Compression Q3 2025).

Nucor’s strategic advantages persist. The company’s Electric Arc Furnace (EAF) footprint gives flexibility relative to blast-furnace producers: lower fixed-cost intensity, faster cycle times, and better suitability to recycled-scrap inputs. Those structural features help Nucor protect margins once spreads normalize. Market-share gains and scale — with management reporting a North American market share near ~22% in recent periods — create further operating leverage when demand and pricing are favorable.

Tariffs and trade policy have also functioned as a supporting factor for domestic pricing; reduced low-cost import flows have kept a floor under domestic finished prices. That mix of EAF economics, scale, and policy support explains why management is comfortable maintaining buybacks while spending on capacity. The competitive picture compared to blast-furnace peers is that Nucor is better positioned for rapid response in a volatile pricing environment, but that advantage does not immunize it from short-term spread compression Vertex AI Research - QUERY 4 (Competitive Positioning & Market Share).

Quality of earnings: cash flow versus reported income#

A key question for analysts is whether Nucor's earnings are high quality. The fiscal story shows meaningful divergence between accounting net income and cash generation in 2024. While GAAP net income was $2.03B, cash-flow from operations was $3.98B and free cash flow $0.81B, after $3.17B of capex and nearly $0.76B of acquisition outflows. The difference underscores that reported net income understates the company's operating cash but that the business is in a heavy investment phase that is consuming free cash flow. In other words, operating cash remained positive, but capital intensity and strategic deals materially reduced distributable cash in FY2024 FY2024 Cash Flow Details.

What this means for investors#

Investors face a trade-off between near-term earnings volatility and a multi-year growth/capacity program that could improve through‑cycle margins. The immediate implication is that quarter-to-quarter earnings will be more volatile; management’s guidance calling for nominally lower Q3 earnings and explicit Steel Mills margin compression is consistent with that. From a balance-sheet perspective, net debt of $3.39B versus FY2024 EBITDA of $4.49B yields roughly 0.75x net-debt/EBITDA, indicating the company has financial room to continue investing and returning capital in most reasonable scenarios.

Longer-term, the strategic question is execution: will the $3.0B capex program produce the expected incremental throughput and margin lift? If projects ramp on schedule and U.S. demand (infrastructure, manufacturing, energy) holds, the company’s EAF-led model and scale should convert investment into durable earnings. If projects face delays, or if spreads remain compressed, the company’s earnings and free cash flow could remain depressed for longer, tightening the trade-off between growth and shareholder returns Vertex AI Research - QUERY 1 (U.S. Steel Market Trends Q3-Q4 2025).

Key takeaways#

Nucor’s FY2024 results and recent guidance create a clear, data‑driven framework for assessing risk and opportunity. First, profitability has normalized sharply downward from the 2021–2022 peak: FY2024 net income was $2.03B, -55.20% YoY. Second, free cash flow plunged -83.57% YoY to $0.81B, primarily due to higher capex and acquisition outlays. Third, the balance sheet retains flexibility—net debt/EBITDA is roughly 0.75x on FY2024 figures—giving Nucor room to fund capex and maintain dividends. Fourth, management warns of Q3 margin compression in Steel Mills, a short-term headwind that explains near-term guidance weakness while the company continues investing in capacity. Finally, the strategic advantage (EAF model, scale, market share and policy support) remains intact — but it must be translated into improved through-cycle margins for the long-term investment case to be realized.

Closing synthesis: the practical implications#

Nucor today is a company executing a deliberate trade: absorb near-term margin volatility while funding a sizeable expansion of higher-value capacity. That strategy is credible given the EAF operating model, policy tailwinds, and material balance-sheet flexibility. The timing risk is the critical variable. Investors should treat the next several quarters as a test of project execution and market spreads rather than a test of balance-sheet survival. Fiscal metrics show the company can continue to fund dividends and buybacks in the near term, but the durability of that approach depends on project returns and how quickly commodity spreads recover.

In short, Nucor is not a simple cyclical reset or a static dividend story: it is a capital‑intensive industrial in the middle of a capacity and capability cycle. The near-term margin warning is material, but it sits alongside structural advantages that could deliver improved returns over a multi-year horizon if management executes and market spreads normalize. For market participants that is the central narrative to monitor: execution timing, realized spreads in the Steel Mills segment, and the pace at which invested capital shifts from pre-op drag to incremental free cash flow.

Data sources: Company FY2021–FY2024 financial statements and recent management guidance as reflected in the provided financial dataset and supporting research queries Vertex AI Research - QUERY 3 (Growth Projects & Financial Impact) and related research queries on margins, market trends, and capital allocation Vertex AI Research - QUERY 2 (Margin Compression Q3 2025).